| Author
|
Topic: Reporting a church
disturbance |
Eugene Shubert
Member Member # 26
|
posted March 22, 2001 03:36 PM
Ino,
Yes, this is the Laodicean church. And I have nothing but
love for women. But isn’t it just a little annoying when they
presume to be teachers and when you ask them to teach you the
meaning of the Scriptures you quote to overturn everything
they say, their only response is that “Satan is getting his
way with these arguments.”
You’ll have to forgive Doug for wanting certain members of
this forum to destroy each other. He doesn’t like the idea of
having a structured forum where moderators see to it that
differences of opinion are expressed in a kind and courteous
way.
Posts:
709 | From: Texas | Registered: Mar 2000
| IP: Logged
| |
Eugene Shubert
Member Member # 26
|
posted March 22, 2001 03:42 PM
My
theological adversaries seem to be saying that we have no
right to judge our church leaders. I suppose that we can judge
Roman Catholic popes and prelates but that we are to
sheepishly submit to Seventh-day Adventist popes and prelates.
(Isn’t that a distinction without a difference?)
Those of you who really believe this need to become
acquainted with the Spirit of Prophecy on this issue. Please
find and prayerfully read the six part series, The Third Angel’s Message Illustrated by its
Application to Seventh-day Adventists at
www.everythingimportant.org/seventhdayAdventists.
Posts:
709 | From: Texas | Registered: Mar 2000
| IP:
Logged | |
Eugene Shubert
Member Member # 26
|
posted March 22, 2001 05:53 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Ino: Spread the love of
Christ...Isn't that what it's all about?
Yes! But that leads to a theological question. How loving
was Jesus? Isn’t he a bad example for us mortals to follow?
Why did he expose sin in his day and thus purposely allow
himself to be hated by his own nation?
Consider the following:
“The Jews hated Christ because he bore a
beautiful, spotless character. He could hate but one thing,
and that was sin. This hatred of sin on his part provoked
their bitterest hostility. If he had given license to their
pride, had fostered their ambition, and passed over their
evil passions, their injustice, their fraud, their robbery
of the poor, they would have applauded Jesus. They would not
have been displeased that he healed the sick, that he had
compassion on the suffering, that he raised the dead; but
they were displeased because he condemned their evil works,
and put them to an open shame by exposing their evil
motives. He rebuked their long prayers on the corners of the
streets, and the wearing of their long robes for the purpose
of making people think they were very pious, when at the
same time they would devour with exactions widows’ houses.
They would not consent to reform and to be transformed in
character; but they were determined by any possible means to
get rid of Him who revealed their true character to the
people, and paid no regard to their claims of superior
sanctity. The fiercest and most inveterate enmity was put
between Christ and these bigoted pretenders. The whole
energy of the ranks of apostasy was called forth, and evil
men conspired with evil angels for the destruction of the
Champion of God and truth.” The Signs of the Times,
February 27, 1896.
Peter says, “Above all, love each other deeply, because
love covers over a multitude of sins.” 1 Peter 4:8. On the
other side, Paul says, “Have nothing to do with the fruitless
deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.” Ephesians 5:11.
(Evidently, there are sins unto death and sins not unto death.
1 John 5:16). It is my position that the darkest and the
deadliest sins in the church should be openly condemned. Eugene Shubert
Posts:
709 | From: Texas | Registered: Mar 2000
| IP: Logged
| |
Debberzz
New Member Member # 542
|
posted March 24, 2001 02:32 PM
Eugene, Forgive me if this sounds impertinent, but I
seek to understand your position, and I ask out of genuine
confusion.
If you would not have women teach, why would you want to
include the writings of Ellen White in such discussions?
Unless there is some deep dark secret here, she was as female
as I am.
Deb
Posts:
7 | From: Freedom, California | Registered:
Jul 2000 | IP: Logged
| |
|
|
me again
Member Member # 837
|
posted April 08, 2001 12:59 PM
quote:
Posted by Aletha: Hello Brethren! ....Yes, it's me
again!
I beg to differ
Posts:
291 | From: USA | Registered: Mar 2001
| IP: Logged
| |
Eugene Shubert
Member Member # 26
|
posted April 18, 2001 07:56 AM
quote:
Originally posted by meghan1: hmmm interesting, don't
you think
meghan1,
This thread is probably interesting to different folks for
different reasons. I’m charmed by the first post and was very
surprised that the opening question wasn’t understood by
anyone. Isn’t it remarkable that so many Seventh-day
Adventists responded without hesitation by condemning Jesus
and siding with the Jewish church?
I believe that this entire episode is very much like the
Biblical account in Luke 4:14-30 and proves the thesis
advanced in the sensible thread, Pharisees, Sadducees, Seventh-day
Adventists.
Posts:
709 | From: Texas | Registered: Mar 2000
| IP: Logged
| |
Eugene Shubert
Member Member # 26
|
posted May 08, 2001 03:13 AM
Originally
posted by Aletha on page 1:
quote:
In answer to your question, Jesus Christ is God. He had
every right to judge and chasten the rulers....
because He is God!
Please read the text I’m referring to (Luke
4:14-30). The
offense of Jesus was that He cited historical facts that stung
the spiritual pride of the Jews and forcefully diminished
their collective self-righteousness. Anyone could have done
that! It would be like me posting this link about Seventh-day
Adventists in Nazi Germany:
Adventists in Nazi Germany
Do you mean that it would have been a sin for anyone else
to refer to the Scripture that Jesus mentioned?
Posts:
709 | From: Texas | Registered: Mar 2000
| IP: Logged
| |
Margaret Gray
Member Member # 859
|
posted May 08, 2001 03:43 AM
Dear
Eugene,
Mrs. Gray is pleased with your zealous involvement in
conversation, however she is not puzzled as to the reception
you have received after reviewing your methodology of
presenting your viewpoints. To be frank, she finds it hard to
consider your materials seriously.
Sincerely,
Mrs. Gray
Posts:
264 | From: Kansas City, MO | Registered: Apr
2001 | IP: Logged
| | |